Sri Lanka Equity Forum
Dear Reader,

Registration with the Sri Lanka Equity Forum would enable you to enjoy an array of other services such as Member Rankings, User Groups, Own Posts & Profile, Exclusive Research, Live Chat Box etc..

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.


Thank You
Sri Lanka Equity Forum

Discussion Forum for Stock Market Investors in Sri Lanka

සිංහල පරිවර්තනය
Submit Post
Submit Post
Market Place

Add an ad

View all ads

Latest topics

» EMER...?????
by ehele90 Today at 6:42 pm

» JKH will touch 175 very soon
by Bakka1988 Today at 3:24 pm

» CIND බලාගෙනයි
by Bakka1988 Today at 3:15 pm

» Positive News
by Promoney Today at 2:21 pm

» Why AAIC Should trade above RS.50/-
by nosf76677 Today at 2:01 pm

» Browns investments
by Winner123 Today at 11:33 am

» lOFC definitely will hit 6/-
by wealth123 Today at 10:49 am

» GLASS (piramal glass ceylon plc) from
by MarketWch Today at 10:20 am

» Capital trust recommended to buy AEL ..Target Price Rs.24.50
by wisdom79 Today at 9:27 am

» Elcection Commisioner( MACO)
by Capton KIng Cool Today at 8:59 am

» Presidential election will be held on 16 th of November to 7th of December
by rukshan1234 Yesterday at 11:30 pm

» Which Trading System Or Strategy Is The Most Profitable?
by Teller Yesterday at 8:13 pm

» NEST will touch Rs2000 soon
by Bakka1988 Yesterday at 5:41 pm

» Gotabaya Rajapaksha will named after 10th August. Aspi will move above 6500
by samaritan Yesterday at 11:59 am

» CFVF.N0000 - Target price Rs.60- Donnt sell
by Trader321 Yesterday at 10:06 am

» CFVF.N0000 - Really started Again ..........
by Trader321 Yesterday at 9:59 am

» LOLC Holding( LOLC N.0000)
by Capton KIng Cool Yesterday at 8:45 am

» LOLC Holding( LOLC N.0000) MICRO FINACE In Cambodia
by Capton KIng Cool Yesterday at 8:43 am

» PAN ASIA BANK
by samaritan Yesterday at 8:17 am

» ASHO will hit moon. Deal with SLTB
by Bakka1988 Sun Aug 18, 2019 9:41 pm

» CFVF.N0000 - Deal at What price?
by Winner123 Fri Aug 16, 2019 8:35 pm

» Profitability of all the banks slides down on bigger margins
by hammurabi Fri Aug 16, 2019 8:25 pm

» කව්ද පකීර් ?(who is the Veteran)
by reyaz Fri Aug 16, 2019 7:32 pm

» News AEL super report in this quarter Don't sell ..
by sheildskye Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:59 pm

» HEXP : GOOD TO COLLECT BELOW RS.85
by Trader321 Fri Aug 16, 2019 10:20 am

» CFVF.N0000 :Amazing Result- Quarter Profit more than Half Billion
by Winner123 Thu Aug 15, 2019 12:43 pm

» Kzoo vs onal
by wisdom79 Wed Aug 14, 2019 9:45 pm

» GREG is back
by wisdom79 Wed Aug 14, 2019 9:42 pm

» AAIC - Profit over one billion!!!!!
by wisdom79 Wed Aug 14, 2019 9:39 pm

» Sri Lankan Billionaire Dhammika Perera may Spend Rs. 10 Billion for a Presidential Campaign without any Risk! His Daily Casino Profits said to be over Rs. 50 Million
by Teller Wed Aug 14, 2019 8:40 am

» CFVF : Another dividend ?
by Promoney Tue Aug 13, 2019 7:28 pm

» CFVF.N0000 & PARQ.N0000 - These two counters Must be in your Portfolios
by Trader321 Tue Aug 13, 2019 6:39 pm

» PARQ.N0000 : Target Price Rs. 50 /=
by Hewagak Tue Aug 13, 2019 5:01 pm

» TAP Less than 1% Shares in the Market
by sanjulanka Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:10 pm

» AEL PRICE TUESDAY
by Winner123 Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:09 pm

» what is the future of KHL (JOHN KEELES HOTELS)
by bhanu Mon Aug 12, 2019 9:03 pm

» TKYO.X0000 will it move furthur?
by bhanu Mon Aug 12, 2019 5:00 pm

» stock market investors and cheated those who approached them.
by Asoka Samarakone Mon Aug 12, 2019 10:14 am

» LLMP can run in present market
by wealth123 Mon Aug 12, 2019 10:03 am

» Where Is Equity Champ
by Teller Mon Aug 12, 2019 8:52 am

» Pending AEL crossing @ Rs.20 deal near soon..
by EPS Sun Aug 11, 2019 8:26 pm

» HI EVERY ONE I'M NEW TO THE MARKET PLEASE HELP ME IS IT GOOD TIME TO ENTER THE MARKET AND WHAT IS GOOD TO BUy?
by King of vice Sun Aug 11, 2019 7:38 am

» Let's Pump And Dump BUT...
by King of vice Sun Aug 11, 2019 7:26 am


You are not connected. Please login or register

Sri Lanka Equity Forum » Stock Market & Forum Help » The Prison » HSBC: Too Big To Jail. But UBS?

HSBC: Too Big To Jail. But UBS?

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1HSBC: Too Big To Jail. But UBS? Empty HSBC: Too Big To Jail. But UBS? on Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:19 pm

nihal777


Stock Trader
I wrote this for The New Republic last week. Some big questions with the UBS LIBOR settlement coming out this week. While the good news is that there apparently will be a plea by UBS' Japanese subsidiary for seeking to manipulate the global interest rate, the bigger question is whether the absence of charges against the parent company is because of its size and interconnectedness (in other words, Too Big to Fail/Jail), or because the criminal conduct was limited to the subsidiary. If the former, you can more or less substitute UBS for HSBC below.
Too Big to Jail: Our Banking System's Latest Disgrace

You can be forgiven if you watched the Department of Justice’s announcement yesterday of a $1.92 billion settlement with HSBC with a sense of disappointment--and déjà vu. The event checked all the boxes in a theatrical routine that has become all too familiar.

Descriptions of breathtaking misconduct involving the facilitation of massive drug trafficking and transactions with rogue terror-sponsoring nations? Check.

Broad boasts about the "historic" nature of the settlement that will certainly end the type of criminal misconduct alleged? Check.

Mea culpas from the offending institution with promises that it has really learned its lesson this time and will never ever engage in dastardly conduct again? Yep, that too.

Nothing, however, was quite as it appeared. Sure, HSBC paid a record fine, but there was something vitally important missing from yesterday's press conference: actual criminal charges for obvious criminal conduct.

Some perspective: HSBC sent more than $800 million in bulk cash from Mexico to the United States, a good chunk of which apparently represented proceeds from some of the most notorious Colombian drug cartels. As someone who tried the first narcotics money laundering case involving extradition from Colombia, let me assure you that this is a lot of money, the discovery of which usually generates vigorous prosecutions and lengthy prison sentences. And it wasn’t HSBC’s only dirty business: There were also hundreds of millions of more dollars of illegally disguised transactions with rogue nations such as Iran and Sudan.

Why no criminal charges? Why instead only some remedial measures and a "historical" fine that can be measured in weeks -- not years -- of earnings? It certainly wasn’t for lack of evidence. No, instead the government determined that HSBC is not only too big to fail, but also too big to jail. As the New York Times first reported, even though there were strong voices within DOJ pushing for criminal charges, the big banks' best friends within the government (the Treasury Department, of course, and other unnamed regulators) were too fearful that an indictment could destabilize the global financial system. Yes, it's 2008 all over again. In the name of systemic stability, a megabank again escapes accountability for its actions, rescued by compliant officials.

In some aspects, DOJ's surrender is understandable. Notwithstanding regulatory reform efforts in the U.S. and the UK, the largest banks are in many ways even more systemically dangerous today than when we bailed them out in 2008. This indirect acknowledgment that we have failed to fix the too-big-to-fail problem has potentially dire consequences.

One of the reasons why we have a criminal justice system, of course, is to deter criminal behavior. If you know that you will be punished for putting your hand in the cash register at your local supermarket (or illegally stripping out information from a monetary transaction that identifies the source nation as Iran), you are less likely to do so. But if the government offered a blanket waiver from criminal accountability for a certain group -- let's say all left-handed people over six feet tall or a handful of banks deemed so large and so significant that their indictment could destroy the global financial system -- we would expect that those exempted would no longer be deterred from committing criminal acts. And although lefty giants may otherwise lack a predisposition for boosting cash, in recent years the largest banks have demonstrated an unbridled zeal for pushing the boundaries of the law as part of their relentless pursuit of profits. DOJ's actions with regards to HSBC are beyond unfair: They are downright terrifying for weakening the general deterrence for megabanks, both foreign and domestic, which could rationally interpret yesterday's actions as a license to steal.

The enduring presumption of bailouts in our banking system already drives the largest banks to take on too much risk with too little disclosure and too much leverage, a toxic cocktail that will inevitably lead to another financial crisis. Yesterday's action now spikes the punch with a new toxin, confirmation that criminal penalties are off the table, leaving a worst-case scenario of a fine totaling far less than even a single quarter's earnings. Given the potential profits of criminal behavior and the unlikelihood of personal consequences for the executives directing it, the message is clear: Crime pays. This will inevitably lead to more reckless risk-taking that will further undermine systemic stability and lead to an even greater financial meltdown down the road.

There is, of course, a solution for our emerging two-tier system of justice. The largest banks need to be broken up, the only realistic way to truly end both too big to fail and too big to jail. But since our government has demonstrated a reluctance to do so, perhaps the next time a megabank presents HSBC's argument that it should not be criminally charged because it would destabilize the financial system, instead of capitulating to this threat, DOJ should require at a bare minimum that in return for allowing the bank to survive, it must break itself up, ensuring that it could never hold the justice system hostage again. Otherwise, we can look forward to many more press conferences that are long on drama but short on impact.

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum