REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate

TuskerLK

TuskerLK

Senior Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 403
Join date : 2011-03-08

For me auditors are not ethical at all. Most of the young guys and girls who works days and nights to meets the deadline are getting paid a allowance (not salary) less than what a estate worker get paid.

So how come we can expect a reliable work from them?

mark

mark

Expert

Posts : 2676
Join date : 2011-02-04

guys,same thing i experienced in CSF results,ddn't got correct values......don't know,i may be wrongly calculated,but there was many questions.. Suspect

Gaja

Gaja

Associate Director - Equity Analytics

Posts : 3127
Join date : 2011-01-27

@smallville wrote:

@Gaja wrote:interestingly, admin or moderators or any of the members of you have the contact with the company, why don't you informed to the company and ask them to correct it

I already sent them a note requesting an explanation..

Good let us know, if you got the reply

Hiru

Hiru

Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 274
Join date : 2011-04-24

tinyman wrote:For me auditors are not ethical at all. Most of the young guys and girls who works days and nights to meets the deadline are getting paid a allowance (not salary) less than what a estate worker get paid.

So how come we can expect a reliable work from them?

That is true trainees are doing all the field work for Audits, but there are several stages which pay attention to accounts before they reach to Assigned Partner for his signature, specially in big for Audit Firms. So, have these managers at the audit firm failed to comply with procedures?
However, it seems these statements are not Audited.

Above all, I believe, there must be check for accuracy at CSE before publishing accounts on the CSE Website as all investors are not of the same quality.

GJ

GJ

Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 126
Join date : 2011-06-02

is it good or bad to buy?
--
===
====
=====

Hiru

Hiru

Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 274
Equity Stars : 3634
Reputation : 31
Join date : 2011-04-24

@GJ wrote:is it good or bad to buy?
--
===
====
=====

VFIN is good at below Rs 50.

REEF is good to watch and buy as there would be huge capital gains. For me REEF.W0017 is comparably good. My view is based on the current trend and the information currently available, but not on fundamentals.

Please search for information available and evaluate by your self as money is yours.

smallville

smallville

Associate Director - Equity Analytics

Posts : 4119
Equity Stars : 8605
Reputation : 530
Join date : 2011-02-03
Location : Back on Earth

@Gaja wrote:

@smallville wrote:

@Gaja wrote:interestingly, admin or moderators or any of the members of you have the contact with the company, why don't you informed to the company and ask them to correct it

I already sent them a note requesting an explanation..

Good let us know, if you got the reply

I'm afraideven after 2 days I've recieved NO reply.. U know wat this means right??? Twisted Evil

Poor souls.. Can we send this to SEC as well? indicating the malpractice by company??

monash

monash

Senior Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 355
Equity Stars : 4761
Reputation : 16
Join date : 2011-01-22

Smallville i also waited for your post to know the response of company.

Yes of course we can inform this to SEC. i think there is possibility to sue the company also if you have money and time, Consult a lawyer.. Wink

Reef is a pure scam.. the latest victim of them is CLND.

smallville

smallville

Associate Director - Equity Analytics

Posts : 4119
Equity Stars : 8605
Reputation : 530
Join date : 2011-02-03
Location : Back on Earth

@monash wrote:Smallville i also waited for your post to know the response of company.

Yes of course we can inform this to SEC. i think there is possibility to sue the company also if you have money and time, Consult a lawyer..
Reef is a pure scam.. the latest victim of them is CLND.

Well to be honest with, I dont have a single share even warrants.. but just for the community service I tried informing the company toget some response.. They didnt have the courtesy to accept it a mistake or whatever further assures this is a pure scam Wink

Well I have other fish to fry.. so if some can post this to SEC, would be glad.. Wink

intelstk

intelstk

Senior Equity Analytic

Posts : 61
Equity Stars : 3329
Reputation : 5
Join date : 2011-05-26

tinyman wrote:For me auditors are not ethical at all. Most of the young guys and girls who works days and nights to meets the deadline are getting paid a allowance (not salary) less than what a estate worker get paid.

So how come we can expect a reliable work from them?

this is nothing to do with auditors. These interim figures are un audited. They responsible for annual audited figures only. Even that case prepartion and presentation of FS in a responsible of Directors.

Eventhough they are paid less than state workers, they are doing great job for the entire market definitly. So, don scold auditors in this case plssssssssssss

duke

duke

Senior Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 552
Equity Stars : 4024
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2011-03-14

@smallville wrote:

@monash wrote:Smallville i also waited for your post to know the response of company.

Yes of course we can inform this to SEC. i think there is possibility to sue the company also if you have money and time, Consult a lawyer..
Reef is a pure scam.. the latest victim of them is CLND.

Well to be honest with, I dont have a single share even warrants.. but just for the community service I tried informing the company toget some response.. They didnt have the courtesy to accept it a mistake or whatever further assures this is a pure scam
Well I have other fish to fry.. so if some can post this to SEC, would be glad..

complaining to SEC is futile, waste of time and postage stamps.

gann

gann

Senior Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 425
Equity Stars : 3978
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2011-01-27

Maybe they have added the capital gain from CLND implicitly Smile

Slstock

Slstock

Director - Equity Analytics

Posts : 6614
Equity Stars : 11879
Reputation : 1158
Join date : 2011-01-22

@gann wrote:Maybe they have added the capital gain from CLND implicitly

If you are serious . no can do. This is for quarter ending March 31st isn't it.

In anycase it is inexcusable to make such drastic errors. If they have an alternative way of calculating EPS it is in decent interest to let the public know.

gann

gann

Senior Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 425
Equity Stars : 3978
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2011-01-27

@slstock wrote:

@gann wrote:Maybe they have added the capital gain from CLND implicitly

If you are serious . no can do. This is for quarter ending March 31st isn't it.

In anycase it is inexcusable to make such drastic errors. If they have an alternative way of calculating EPS it is in decent interest to let the public know.

I was kidding. geek

Chinwi

Chinwi

Associate Director - Equity Analytics

Posts : 3098
Equity Stars : 7462
Reputation : 418
Join date : 2010-06-08
Location : Asia

This can not be a mistake nor an ignorance.

As a manager you know the position of you company. You do not need a report to have a general idea of you company. That is in your day to day life.

When there is a 7 Rupee figure at the bottom for REEF any donkey who go through the report before releasing it should know that is impossible.

DPPEL

DPPEL

Stock Trader

Posts : 7
Equity Stars : 3210
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-06-22

what do you think vfin curent price ......

greedy

greedy

Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 280
Equity Stars : 3500
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2011-07-21

A similar mistake that I found in Browns IPO..... (I posted this in another forum)

I was looking at Browns IPO Prospectus & came across this funny EPS figure in the accounts for the 9 months ended 31.12.2010. As per the prospectus, the EPS number is LKR4.917. There were 98mn shares as of 31 March 2010 and this was sub divided in an 1:10 ratio in 16/11/2010. Post split number of shares became 980mn shares.

As per the income statement, net profit for the 9 month period ended 31.12.2010 is LKR1,445.556mn.

Therefore, based on the above numbers the EPS for the period is;

EPS = LKR1,445.556mn/980mn

= LKR1.475.

So how did they get an EPS of LKR4.917? Is this an error or done deliberately?

I Guess they have done a wrong Calculation. The below could have been their calculation which is wrong...

Net Profit for the period LKR1,445.556mn

Weighted Average Number of shares (98mn+882mn/9months*2months) = 294mn shares

EPS = LKR1,445.556/294mn shares
EPS = LKR 4.917

Anyone with accounting knowledge would know that when there is a share split, EPS needs to be calculated based on post split numbers not by weighted average number of shares.

smallville

smallville

Associate Director - Equity Analytics

Posts : 4119
Equity Stars : 8605
Reputation : 530
Join date : 2011-02-03
Location : Back on Earth

@greedy wrote:A similar mistake that I found in Browns IPO..... (I posted this in another forum)

I was looking at Browns IPO Prospectus & came across this funny EPS figure in the accounts for the 9 months ended 31.12.2010. As per the prospectus, the EPS number is LKR4.917. There were 98mn shares as of 31 March 2010 and this was sub divided in an 1:10 ratio in 16/11/2010. Post split number of shares became 980mn shares.

As per the income statement, net profit for the 9 month period ended 31.12.2010 is LKR1,445.556mn.

Therefore, based on the above numbers the EPS for the period is;

EPS = LKR1,445.556mn/980mn

= LKR1.475.

So how did they get an EPS of LKR4.917? Is this an error or done deliberately?

I Guess they have done a wrong Calculation. The below could have been their calculation which is wrong...

Net Profit for the period LKR1,445.556mn

Weighted Average Number of shares (98mn+882mn/9months*2months) = 294mn shares

EPS = LKR1,445.556/294mn shares
EPS = LKR 4.917

Anyone with accounting knowledge would know that when there is a share split, EPS needs to be calculated based on post split numbers not by weighted average number of shares.

Welcome to the forum buddy.. Hope you're the same person..
And good finding..
However I think even with the correct EPS figure of 1.4, Browns inv. is fairly ok.. but its shame on EPS calculation Wink

First VFIN then REEF now BIL.. Seems like accountants are not that intelligent these days or authorities don't care.. Shame on us for not looking at this earlier too. Evil or Very Mad

rijayasooriya

rijayasooriya

Senior Vice President - Equity Analytics

Posts : 1827
Equity Stars : 5310
Reputation : 134
Join date : 2011-05-25
Location : Matara

@smallville wrote:

@greedy wrote:A similar mistake that I found in Browns IPO..... (I posted this in another forum)

I was looking at Browns IPO Prospectus & came across this funny EPS figure in the accounts for the 9 months ended 31.12.2010. As per the prospectus, the EPS number is LKR4.917. There were 98mn shares as of 31 March 2010 and this was sub divided in an 1:10 ratio in 16/11/2010. Post split number of shares became 980mn shares.

As per the income statement, net profit for the 9 month period ended 31.12.2010 is LKR1,445.556mn.

Therefore, based on the above numbers the EPS for the period is;

EPS = LKR1,445.556mn/980mn

= LKR1.475.

So how did they get an EPS of LKR4.917? Is this an error or done deliberately?

I Guess they have done a wrong Calculation. The below could have been their calculation which is wrong...

Net Profit for the period LKR1,445.556mn

Weighted Average Number of shares (98mn+882mn/9months*2months) = 294mn shares

EPS = LKR1,445.556/294mn shares
EPS = LKR 4.917

Anyone with accounting knowledge would know that when there is a share split, EPS needs to be calculated based on post split numbers not by weighted average number of shares.

Welcome to the forum buddy.. Hope you're the same person..
And good finding..
However I think even with the correct EPS figure of 1.4, Browns inv. is fairly ok.. but its shame on EPS calculation
First VFIN then REEF now BIL.. Seems like accountants are not that intelligent these days or authorities don't care.. Shame on us for not looking at this earlier too.

These are the ways that companies use to fool the investers who are not with good knowledge in accounting.
Actually there is some logic behind the method,used by company to calculate EPS.Person without proper accounting knowledge can not understand such tricks.
It is really nice of our experts that they have kept an eye on such cunning tricks and posted those to the form.
Thank u very much to all. Exclamation

kiwi

kiwi

Senior Equity Analytic

Posts : 88
Equity Stars : 3366
Reputation : 16
Join date : 2011-05-03
Location : Hobbiton, Middle Earth

REEF have corrected the EPS figure now. I am not sure if there was any explanation given. http://www.cse.lk/cmt/upload_report_file/568_1307353270.pdf

Chinwi

Chinwi

Associate Director - Equity Analytics

Posts : 3098
Equity Stars : 7462
Reputation : 418
Join date : 2010-06-08
Location : Asia

@kiwi wrote:REEF have corrected the EPS figure now. I am not sure if there was any explanation given. http://www.cse.lk/cmt/upload_report_file/568_1307353270.pdf

Can anyone tell me who is the ultimate owner of REEF ?

Is that still Mr. KDD (PABC) or Mr. DJ (Imagewise)

(Pl. Refer above report )

sapumal

sapumal

Vice President - Equity Analytics

Posts : 1105
Equity Stars : 5032
Reputation : 65
Join date : 2010-07-30

@Chinwi wrote:

@kiwi wrote:REEF have corrected the EPS figure now. I am not sure if there was any explanation given. http://www.cse.lk/cmt/upload_report_file/568_1307353270.pdf

Can anyone tell me who is the ultimate owner of REEF ?

Is that still Mr. KDD (PABC) or Mr. DJ (Imagewise)

(Pl. Refer above report )

Currently it is DJ. PABC is the credit provider. Tomorrow it may be differ

hariesha

hariesha

Vice President - Equity Analytics

Posts : 1058
Equity Stars : 5782
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2011-03-14

In VFIN its anualised EPS, not for the qtr. Correctly all companies should show their EPS in anualised format. So in VFIN EPS of 4.64 is correct and it trades @ PER of 9.2 which is atractive.

greedy

greedy

Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 280
Equity Stars : 3500
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2011-07-21

@hariesha wrote:In VFIN its anualised EPS, not for the qtr. Correctly all companies should show their EPS in anualised format. So in VFIN EPS of 4.64 is correct and it trades @ PER of 9.2 which is atractive.

Companies should disclose only their quarterly & year to date EPS in the quarterly accounts. Because, that would be the actual number based on actual results. When Quarterly EPS is annualised, it implies that company management tells us that the company is going to make profits similar to the current period in the remaining quarters which is totally inaccurate!

Therefore, EPS, should never be annualised in the Quarterly accounts/prospectus. It's up to the investors to predict what will be results for the coming periods.

reyaz

reyaz

Manager - Equity Analytics

Posts : 281
Equity Stars : 3664
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2011-03-10

@sapumal wrote:I don't have any disagree with your point innam. They can't show a EPS using this statement. It is a magic figure
My point is they had a EPS of Rs 7 during last quarter due to the land revaluation and it is in the balance sheet.

Eps = Earnings for the reporing period
No. Of shares (cumulative)

Sponsored content

Latest topics

REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate

21 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:08 pm

TuskerLK

22 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:24 pm

mark

23 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:27 pm

Gaja

24 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:55 am

Hiru

25 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:02 pm

GJ

26 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:55 pm

Hiru

27 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:23 pm

smallville

28 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:32 pm

monash

29 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:19 pm

smallville

30 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:45 pm

intelstk

31 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:27 pm

duke

32 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:51 am

gann

33 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:56 am

Slstock

34 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:02 am

gann

35 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:51 pm

Chinwi

36 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:54 pm

DPPEL

37 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:43 am

greedy

38 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:45 pm

smallville

39 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Sun Jul 24, 2011 9:53 am

rijayasooriya

40 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Mon Jul 25, 2011 3:52 pm

kiwi

41 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Mon Jul 25, 2011 4:10 pm

Chinwi

42 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:09 pm

sapumal

43 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:33 pm

hariesha

44 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:35 pm

greedy

45 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate on Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:53 am

reyaz

46 Re: REEF and VFIN- Accountants who can't calculate

Sponsored content