Proposal of a new rule to CSE

Redbulls · 26 Re: Proposal of a new rule to CSE Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:22 pm

Redbulls

Director - Equity Analytics

Posts : 6053
Join date : 2012-02-14

Whitebull wrote:

Redbulls wrote:

RIO wrote:

Whitebull wrote:
.................................I can not agree with ur one word which is civil war....I think better word is war against terrorism.

Oh God, had great mistake...thank you for pointing out, Yes we SL never had a civil war...its only a cause of Separatist Terrorism...
I'll correct it now itself in my first post...

I apologize from all Sri Lankans for the said mistake....!

Total mad apologise.
Please read all the statements made by MR or LLRC or anyone in the past, they are claiming the war was civil war.
Do not show patriotism by apologising stupididly.
Read this link which also created by Srilankan scholars.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lessons_Learnt_and_Reconciliation_Commission

අද බටහිරයන් මූලික වශයෙන් ඉල්ලන්නේ උගත් පාඩම් කොමිසමේ වාර්තාව ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන ලෙස ය. පත් නොකළ යුතුව තිබූ උගත් පාඩම් කොමිසම ප්‍රශ්නයට අවතීර්ණ වී ඇත්තේ මෙරට දෙමළ ජනයාට ප්‍රශ්නයක්‌ ඇත යනුවෙන් කීමෙනි. මේ කොමිසම ඉදිරියේ ඔවුන්ගේ ආරාධනයෙන් මා සාක්‍ෂි දුන් අවස්‌ථාවේ මෙහි ජනවාර්ගික ප්‍රශ්නයක්‌ නැති බව මම තර්කානුකූලව හා සාක්‍ෂි සහිතව පෙන්වා දුන්නෙමි. මගේ සාක්‍ෂියෙන් පසු එක්‌ කොමසාරිස්‌වරයකු පැවසුවේ මගේ ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම තර්කානුකූල වුවත්, ඔවුන්ට (දෙමළ වෙල්ලායන්ට හා ඔවුන් පසුපස සිටින බටහිරයන්ට) යමක්‌ දිය යුතු බව ය. පැහැදිලිව ම බටහිරයන්ගේ අධ්‍යාපනයක්‌ ලැබූ කොමිසමේ මහත්ම මහත්මීන් ඉංගිරිසින් උගන්වා ඇති ජනවාර්ගික ප්‍රශ්නයක්‌ ඇතැයි යන පූර්ව නිගමනයේ පිහිටි බව පැහැදිලි ය.

http://www.divaina.com/2012/03/25/nalin.html

I do not have an english version of this article.

The otherthing is we have to remember this is a public forum and we should respect all the members eventhough their idea is not tally with us .I do not think anyone is stupid here.

So with all due respect sir(Redbulls) I think you should mind ur language before insulting another member.

This is not an insult, if you read carefully.
I mind my language very well, if some one in the public forum wants to misinterpret the fact,how you will response?
I'm not saying the poster is stupid the comment is stupid.
Logically I'm correct and if you want I can argue and prolong the discussion to any extend.
Do we need that in this forum?
Shall we stop at this moment and concentrate on trading or investing?

Whitebull · 27 Re: Proposal of a new rule to CSE Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:42 pm

Whitebull

Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics

Posts : 876
Join date : 2012-05-15

Redbulls wrote:I mind my language very well, if some one in the public forum wants to misinterpret the fact,how you will response?

Before ends this I have to answer ur question.

In my opinion there is no violation of any fact.Even there is a violation of fact I will not insult commenter or the comment.I will argue in a polite passion with valid sensible arguments and I will not be emotional.Hope I answered to ur question.

smallville · 28 Re: Proposal of a new rule to CSE Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:44 pm

smallville

Associate Director - Equity Analytics

Posts : 4119
Join date : 2011-02-03

Although free flow is what required in a stock market I also feel that some mechanism should be available to protect the valuable (fundamentally trong) companies.
The approach should not count manipulated shares but companies with strong financial results and the ones which are striving to improve..

The absurd pricing we see now only can be achieved on an extreme bear situation (unless a company is winding up) and ppl who had invested for the sole purpose expecting future prospects and who dont look much into their portfolios regularly might be in great despair without a clear picture as to how they could see a bright future for their investments..

If one buys a counter ard 80 and it went up to 100 but he was looking to sell higher and he didnt sell it and unfortunately today's value of it is 50-60, could be in a real dillema what to do now..

smallville · 29 Re: Proposal of a new rule to CSE Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:46 pm

smallville

Associate Director - Equity Analytics

Posts : 4119
Join date : 2011-02-03

Whitebull wrote:

Redbulls wrote:I mind my language very well, if some one in the public forum wants to misinterpret the fact,how you will response?

Before ends this I have to answer ur question.

In my opinion there is no violation of any fact.Even there is a violation of fact I will not insult commenter or the comment.I will argue in a polite passion with valid sensible arguments and I will not be emotional.Hope I answered to ur question.

Guys no further arguments necesary.. We have to stick to the topic of this post..

traderathome · 30 Re: Proposal of a new rule to CSE Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:52 pm

traderathome

Senior Vice President - Equity Analytics

Posts : 2485
Join date : 2012-02-26

stumpy wrote:Rio,
This is the first time I'm seeing something unusual or not practical from ya!
machang,
Anyone should not impose rules n regulations or policies which can affect the free flow (free movement) of the markets!
That's what I believe!

Supply n Demand has to decide the prices...not any other thing!

I am not suprised, coming from TA Very Happy

traderathome · 31 Re: Proposal of a new rule to CSE Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:56 pm

traderathome

Senior Vice President - Equity Analytics

Posts : 2485
Equity Stars : 7202
Reputation : 133
Join date : 2012-02-26
Age : 50
Location : Abu Dhabi

Last thing we need too many restrictions on the market. This is not good, what we need to do is not to react but catch the culprits and have checks and balances in place. then this sort of nonsense will be mitigated. let June pass ....