UNHRC resolution on Sri Lanka: Test of India’s backbone as an emerging regional power
US resolution on Lanka only to divert attention from Israel - Cho S. Ramaswamy, editor of the Tamil weekly Thuglak, and a former Rajya Sabha member.
Mr Ramaswamy in his interview with R. Bhagwan Singh of the Deccan Chronicle on the 18th of March, questions why the US has moved this resolution. He says “What happened when the UNHCR spoke about (alleged violations by) Israel?
The US attacked it and said that this is becoming political. Why target Israel when there are violations all over the world? You are doing all this country-specific thing and that won’t do, the US had said. And that’s what India says. Perhaps, the US has come up with this resolution just to show that there are human rights violations elsewhere, too, in order to divert the world’s attention from Israel. Why should India be interested in it? Why should the Tamil champions be interested in it?”
If indeed this is the motivation for the US to move this resolution, why should other countries fall for this ploy? Why should India support it?
The tantalizing question being asked in many circles, nationally within India, and in other countries like China and Pakistan is whether India will support or oppose the resolution on Sri Lanka moved by the USA and its western allies.
It is understood that India, as a regional power, is and will be different to China as a regional or the new super power of the world. It is a democracy and it has to contend with domestic contentions. It however cannot succumb to domestic pressure if that pressure is due to domestic issues of another country.
The dilemma for the India government today about whether to support or oppose the US sponsored UNHRC resolution on Sri Lanka is not because of possible human rights violations or possible war crimes. It is because of the pressure exerted on it by its regional ally in Tamil Nadu, the DMK, and the ADMK government of Tamil Nadu.
The DMK and the ADMK have played musical chairs on the Sri Lankan Tamil issue, and at times they have lent covert or overt support to the LTTE using the political motives of the LTTE as the reason for that support. They chose then to ignore the means that the LTTE employed to achieve their ends. Neither the DMK nor the ADMK have changed that stance as neither has condemned the LTTE for the atrocities they committed, violating all norms relating to human rights for 30 years in pursuance of a political objective.
The Union government of India cannot support this position, and ignore the failure of the DMK and the ADMK to condemn the LTTE.
The second issue that the Indian government has to take into account is propriety of either itself or the Tamil Nadu government and other political parties there meddling in the internal affairs of another sovereign country.
Sri Lankan Tamils are Sri Lankan Tamils, not Indian Tamils. If being a Tamil, living anywhere in the world, establishes a kinship with Tamil Nadu Tamils, then India could potentially meddle in the internal affairs of many countries where Tamils live.
For example, they could meddle in the internal affairs of Canada, as Toronto has the highest number of Sri Lankan Tamils living outside Sri Lanka.
If the kinship argument is taken further Greece could interfere in the internal affairs of Australia as Australia reportedly has the highest number of Greeks outside Greece. The list of such instances can be very long.
If India wishes to earn the respect of its neighbours, it has to draw a line in the sand on interfering in the internal affairs of other countries, and not succumb to pressure from its own constituents. It can certainly discuss concerns it has as a friendly neighbor on issues arising from its own domestic situations and on a bi lateral basis.
India however cannot be party to internationalization of another country’s domestic issues because of its own domestic contentions, and the pressure exerted on it by its domestic constituents. To do so will redefine what sovereign rights mean, and it will devalue its credibility and its strength as a major regional power.
India needs to stand up to its own domestic pressure groups, and it needs to stand up to the US and other western nations that are exerting pressure on it to do something that unjustly impinges on the sovereignty of another country. Failure to do so will render India impotent and a servant of other powerful nations.
The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which has traditionally supported the BJP has taken a firm stand on the Resolution and urged the Indian government to oppose it. In an editorial in the latest issue of RSS’ mouthpiece ‘Organiser’, it says “If India baulks today and adopts a ‘neutral’ position, it would find itself in the dock one day. India by its geo-political position must take a robust stand against the west interfering in issues not concerning them directly. There is no case for the US or any European nations to dictate to a democratically elected government.”
It adds that India should not support this attempt to humiliate it in a world forum that “belongs as much to us as it does to the West”.
The Organiser further states that the last few weeks of the war that are under scrutiny now witnessed a pitched battle in which both sides “killed and got killed unrestrained”.
“The number of child soldiers LTTE chief V Prabhakaran recruited and trained has not been documented. Boys and girls were picked up at an unsuspecting age, fed on a liberal dose of LTTE literature enumerating the torture and humiliation of the Tamils by the Lankans and were prepared to ‘fight’ on the command of the well-structured LTTE ‘army’,” the editorial said.
Sri Lanka has stated publicly that it will implement the LLRC recommendations. It has already begun implementing some of them. It does not make any sense for the US resolution to ask Sri Lanka to do what it has already done, and is doing. It makes sense only if the US has a different agenda in wishing to ask Sri Lanka to do what it is already doing.
In any event, the LLRC recommendations are a matter for Sri Lanka and its citizens. It does not concern the UNHRC or the US, or other Western nations.
Sri Lankans have a right to hold their government accountable and pressurize it to implement recommendations in its own LLRC. Others should butt out and leave Sri Lanka alone.
- Asian Tribune –