Start a anylysis-GREG

I have seen lot of stones and flowers are thrown To "GREG" by people in this forum.
But it is a share traded at CSE.It has got a director board , doing business legally , financials are published based on regulatory requirement.
Recently renewed interest was shown in GREG.
It is important to discuss its financials , business involved ,Their group structure , balance sheet,their potential in mid to long term ,share holdings ,conversion of warrants,
EPS ,industry .
I think personal argument is not necessary here in this valuable forum.
We will discus it in a more professional way then most of our members get a clear idea to sell or buy.
Please start update.(I am sorry I am a having problem with "Adobe Reader" ,otherwise I would have updated apart what I have ).Thanx

Can be done by promoters, I don't think others will do

better to compare with sector (GREG Include sector) also rather than promoting GREG

Greg is still very much capable.
But they are not using money to make profits. Their vision is to use the money in low price , heavily beaten loss making companies with unpredictable future. Look at groups like Ahun, LOLC, REEF. They making profit streams with the collected money. That's the different between businessman and casino players.

You can raise this concern in the AGM.

ps
deleted is a good businessman. He realized that he is not a good visionaire for new sub and called the great Prema Corray

sapumal wrote:Greg is still very much capable.
But they are not using money to make profits. Their vision is to use the money in low price , heavily beaten loss making companies with unpredictable future. Look at groups like Ahun, LOLC, REEF. They making profit streams with the collected money. That's the different between businessman and casino players.

You can raise this concern in the AGM.

ps
deleted is a good businessman. He realized that he is not a good visionaire for new sub and called the great Prema Corray

.
Sapumal , If we can discuss financials related (EPS),Cash Available for them if they have..Did acquired loss making companies give them the expected return , rather than having general comments (LIKE ...Who bought this .? that fellows two brothers bought this ...).
Better if you have something to share before AGM..

there is news regarding Greg big panic buying will be going there tomorrow.i think that's true.the reason is warrant 1 had a price of 40 range.additional shares issued for 24. but the people who need to make profit from additional shares they need to sell them at least 40 range.there for there should be risen of Greg normal from tomorrow.at least it should come mid forties.because tomorrow warrant 1 is coming to the market.i think big buying is going on.

There is alot of GREG noise again these days all over, Forum, Brokers and Retailers...

Is it Propaganda to shoot up the price or prevent it from falling to its actual value??? Overall the share is JUNK and there is no sign of turn around of company performance in the near to medium term so new comers to CSE please beware!

Cheers!

krishan Aakash wrote:there is news regarding Greg big panic buying will be going there tomorrow.i think that's true.the reason is warrant 1 had a price of 40 range.additional shares issued for 24. but the people who need to make profit from additional shares they need to sell them at least 40 range.there for there should be risen off Greg normal from tomorrow.at least it should come mid forties.because tomorrow warrant 1 is coming to the market.i think big buying is going on.

May God help it to rise mid forty

krishan Aakash wrote:there is news regarding Greg big panic buying will be going there tomorrow.i think that's true.the reason is warrant 1 had a price of 40 range.additional shares issued for 24. but the people who need to make profit from additional shares they need to sell them at least 40 range.there for there should be risen of Greg normal from tomorrow.at least it should come mid forties.because tomorrow warrant 1 is coming to the market.i think big buying is going on.

Everyday he is doing one promotion for GREG. Forum can take two actions.

1. Block these guys
2. Block articles regarding GREG

soileconomy wrote:

sapumal wrote:Greg is still very much capable.
But they are not using money to make profits. Their vision is to use the money in low price , heavily beaten loss making companies with unpredictable future. Look at groups like Ahun, LOLC, REEF. They making profit streams with the collected money. That's the different between businessman and casino players.

You can raise this concern in the AGM.

ps
deleted is a good businessman. He realized that he is not a good visionaire for new sub and called the great Prema Corray

.
Sapumal , If we can discuss financials related (EPS),Cash Available for them if they have..Did acquired loss making companies give them the expected return , rather than having general comments (LIKE ...Who bought this .? that fellows two brothers bought this ...).
Better if you have something to share before AGM..

No general comments. All are well known facts.
Normally I don't like to talk about short term financial indicators. Company's vision gives more meaning than indicators. For an example LOLC hasn't been in Leisure sector for decades. But suddenly after identifying potential LOLC did a heavy investment to the sector by acquiring 5 hotels during very short period.
But still Greg is not working with SL best sectors. Still going after low priced, ... sectors/companies.
That was my point in last post

We can't discuss everything from zero in each post. We have been in this forum. Why do we need to specify these things again and again ?
We know that Greg/CLPL raised money from a right issues and warrant conversions.
Chairman is the one who stated that they focusing on low priced , heavily beaten companies; not by me.

If you are a new comer I will give some examples. They acquired CLPL, DPL, a textile company (?)

CLPL main business was to produce leather boots to army. But what is the future of that business after ending the war ?
Textile business is at a risk since we have to compete with China, Bangladesh. It could further risky with political problems with USA, Europe (DPL is same)
PHAR - Don't have a good idea about that

What I think is GREG is beyond our analysis

where is that KAS pere**

Still Greg can have a very good future. They can raise about 50Bn from all the warrants at the start of the SL booming period. That is not possible with any other companies in SL.
But Greg has to chose best sectors. ATM according to chairman's vision Greg going after heavily beaten sectors. But shareholders can chance his vision. That may be possible if they raise the concern at AGM
If no profit streams no one would be invest on warrants. All the early hard work crashing down to the floor

I think GREG is in the business of converting warrants!

soileconomy wrote:I have seen lot of stones and flowers are thrown To "GREG" by people in this forum.
But it is a share traded at CSE.It has got a director board , doing business legally , financials are published based on regulatory requirement.
Recently renewed interest was shown in GREG.
It is important to discuss its financials , business involved ,Their group structure , balance sheet,their potential in mid to long term ,share holdings ,conversion of warrants,
EPS ,industry .
I think personal argument is not necessary here in this valuable forum.
We will discus it in a more professional way then most of our members get a clear idea to sell or buy.
Please start update.(I am sorry I am a having problem with "Adobe Reader" ,otherwise I would have updated apart what I have ).Thanx

So far no one in our forum to come forward to discuss the company's financial aspects.
This show this share is a crap?
Come on guys give your feed back.

soileconomy wrote:

sapumal wrote:Greg is still very much capable.
But they are not using money to make profits. Their vision is to use the money in low price , heavily beaten loss making companies with unpredictable future. Look at groups like Ahun, LOLC, REEF. They making profit streams with the collected money. That's the different between businessman and casino players.

You can raise this concern in the AGM.

ps
deleted is a good businessman. He realized that he is not a good visionaire for new sub and called the great Prema Corray

.
Sapumal , If we can discuss financials related (EPS),Cash Available for them if they have..Did acquired loss making companies give them the expected return , rather than having general comments (LIKE ...Who bought this .? that fellows two brothers bought this ...).
Better if you have something to share before AGM..

It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.
Warren Buffett

krishan Aakash wrote:there is news regarding Greg big panic buying will be going there tomorrow.i think that's true.the reason is warrant 1 had a price of 40 range.additional shares issued for 24. but the people who need to make profit from additional shares they need to sell them at least 40 range.there for there should be risen of Greg normal from tomorrow.at least it should come mid forties.because tomorrow warrant 1 is coming to the market.i think big buying is going on.

look i kept silent but this is tempting to reply.
please explain,
1) why does it need to rise to 40/- for people who got them at 24/- to make a profit?
2) why would people panic buy at 30+ to allow people who got them at 24/- to sell at 40+ ?
3) what is your source of news?

I'm not disputing whether this will go up or down. Just that I could not find your statement justifiable at all

npp wrote:

krishan Aakash wrote:there is news regarding Greg big panic buying will be going there tomorrow.i think that's true.the reason is warrant 1 had a price of 40 range.additional shares issued for 24. but the people who need to make profit from additional shares they need to sell them at least 40 range.there for there should be risen of Greg normal from tomorrow.at least it should come mid forties.because tomorrow warrant 1 is coming to the market.i think big buying is going on.

look i kept silent but this is tempting to reply.
please explain,
1) why does it need to rise to 40/- for people who got them at 24/- to make a profit?
2) why would people panic buy at 30+ to allow people who got them at 24/- to sell at 40+ ?
3) what is your source of news?

I'm not disputing whether this will go up or down. Just that I could not find your statement justifiable at all

He can't because he is a selfish promoter.

Thanx.Friends For all your feed backs.

I noticed some thing which I like to share with you .
No one came with financials , which could justify its price.

Parent company keep the prices up to a maximum to exercise their warrants.
It is very clear why ,company do not subscribe for warrants.Simply they are selling their warrants in a different way.
Even though they acquire 100or 1000 companies which are under performing ,it will take some time to turn around the companies and some times it may be very difficult (DPL is a good example).
Corporate governance of the board was recently assayed.They gave one important announcement one year after ,which should have given on the same time.Insiders and other manipulators would have known this before general public.
Major share holders origin was investigated by SEC .Outcome is not clear.
At the end of warrant conversation major share holder may have little percentage and if they cant do it with their plans they may go for another warrants issue to go ahead with their agenda.
But I do believe in one thing ,that they have A VERY POWER FULL PROPAGANDA using paper articles , internet gossip , some brokers help as well as some dirty investors who have proved their identity recently.
IT IS UP TO OUR EDUCATED FORUM MEMBERS TO THINK.

soileconomy, Can you share the EPS, NAV for last 10 quarters ? It is not ethical to asked it from us. You are the original poster.

Paper article,... these things don't give a value addition to the company. If they are lucky they can fool investors maximum three occasions using news/gossips..
But not more than that. It is like the opposite story of the tiger and farmer

sapumal wrote:soileconomy, Can you share the EPS, NAV for last 10 quarters ? It is not ethical to asked it from us. You are the original poster.

Paper article,... these things don't give a value addition to the company. If they are lucky they can fool investors maximum three occasions using news/gossips..
But not more than that. It is like the opposite story of the tiger and farmer

.

No brother.I asked If you can give us .
I am not finding fault with anybody.
Was trying to get the correct picture.
thanx .Sapumal for your feed back.

soileconomy wrote:I have seen lot of stones and flowers are thrown To "GREG" by people in this forum.
But it is a share traded at CSE.It has got a director board , doing business legally , financials are published based on regulatory requirement.
Recently renewed interest was shown in GREG.
It is important to discuss its financials , business involved ,Their group structure , balance sheet,their potential in mid to long term ,share holdings ,conversion of warrants,
EPS ,industry .
I think personal argument is not necessary here in this valuable forum.
We will discus it in a more professional way then most of our members get a clear idea to sell or buy.
Please start update.(I am sorry I am a having problem with "Adobe Reader" ,otherwise I would have updated apart what I have ).Thanx

http://get.adobe.com/uk/reader/?promoid=HRZAC

Thanx.Chamith

Rapaport wrote:There is alot of GREG noise again these days all over, Forum, Brokers and Retailers...

Is it Propaganda to shoot up the price or prevent it from falling to its actual value??? Overall the share is JUNK and there is no sign of turn around of company performance in the near to medium term so new comers to CSE please beware!

Cheers!

I have missed the opportunity in participating in some interesting topics during last 30 hrs. Just came home and saw the lot.

Any how can you explain the ACTUAL VALUE OF GREG? I think it will be much helpful.

hariesha

I dont want to waste time trying to figure out the actual value of GREG. I rather use that time and effort to analyse a better share. GREG = JUNK!

Cheers!