Note to Members from a former Admin

SHARK wrote:Where were you all this while   

GMNet wrote:Hope forum had changed from bad to good. I can see a remarkable improvemt in the forum traffic.
CONGATULATIONS!

GMNet wrote:

SHARK wrote:Where were you all this while   

Election was a failure. I lost my job.

balapas wrote:Gmnut you are nothing but a pathetic low life. Slstock is in the other forum and was ment to the members there. You ahould be embarrassed to copy paste it here.  The old crowd will never return to this hell hole. TAH have you got no shame left as well?

GMNet wrote:THIS APPEARED SOMEWHERE IN THE CYBER WORLD

 by slstock Today at 3:07 pm

People ;

Some of us get questions always and some benefit from it. ( maybe got rich also)

But only a very few tells us if you find something interesting or get any interesting news on shares ( you can PM atleast ) . This is one way you can return a favour as we waste so much time to give free views/advice sacrificing our time for others to get rich.

I have to admit that it would be nice not to give always but get something also ( atleast with info)   

SOCIAL SERVICE

Sstar wrote:

GMNet wrote:THIS APPEARED SOMEWHERE IN THE CYBER WORLD

 by slstock Today at 3:07 pm

People ;

Some of us get questions always and some benefit from it. ( maybe got rich also)

But only a very few tells us if you find something interesting or get any interesting news on shares ( you can PM atleast ) . This is one way you can return a favour as we waste so much time to give free views/advice sacrificing our time for others to get rich.

I have to admit that it would be nice not to give always but get something also ( atleast with info)   

SOCIAL SERVICE

What Slstock seems to have mentioned is unethical and perhaps have some implications from the SEC. How could one ask inside information through Private Message using a public forum. I am not a supporter of either, but don't think what Slstock had done is professional or legal.


BTW; please refrain from using bad language.

Meman wrote:

Sstar wrote:

GMNet wrote:THIS APPEARED SOMEWHERE IN THE CYBER WORLD

 by slstock Today at 3:07 pm

People ;

Some of us get questions always and some benefit from it. ( maybe got rich also)

But only a very few tells us if you find something interesting or get any interesting news on shares ( you can PM atleast ) . This is one way you can return a favour as we waste so much time to give free views/advice sacrificing our time for others to get rich.

I have to admit that it would be nice not to give always but get something also ( atleast with info)   

SOCIAL SERVICE

What Slstock seems to have mentioned is unethical and perhaps have some implications from the SEC. How could one ask inside information through Private Message using a public forum. I am not a supporter of either, but don't think what Slstock had done is professional or legal.


BTW; please refrain from using bad language.

Why dont you manage the forum from promoters etc without bothering about whats said somewhere else?
Does not seem like wanting insider information. Seems more like you want to make a story out of it.

bandulawee wrote:I think what SLstock meant was not inside information. In our daily activities some of us come across some information which could have a significant impact on certain share prices. If we share common knowledge available to few of us in this forum there is no reason for SEC to object. People who have inside information will only share it secretly among their clan and we will never be beneficiaries of such information.

bandulawee wrote:I think what SLstock meant was not inside information. In our daily activities some of us come across some information which could have a significant impact on certain share prices. If we share common knowledge available to few of us in this forum there is no reason for SEC to object. People who have inside information will only share it secretly among their clan and we will never be beneficiaries of such information.

stevenapple wrote:

bandulawee wrote:I think what SLstock meant was not inside information. In our daily activities some of us come across some information which could have a significant impact on certain share prices. If we share common knowledge available to few of us in this forum there is no reason for SEC to object. People who have inside information will only share it secretly among their clan and we will never be beneficiaries of such information.

If it is considered to be a request for insider information we have to banned several people here who pretends to know insider information and promote shares based on that.

yellow knife wrote:no....  slstcok seems to be a ethical guy.....what he means is its word of appreciation that matters to a writer of this kind of forums...

Sstar wrote:

yellow knife wrote:no....  slstcok seems to be a ethical guy.....what he means is its word of appreciation that matters to a writer of this kind of forums...

This forum open for Slstock to come and explain his position and action to his previous loyal members of the Sri Lanka Equity Forum who may have followed him. If he doesn't do it surely it reflects and manifest his guilt.

Sstar wrote:

yellow knife wrote:no....  slstcok seems to be a ethical guy.....what he means is its word of appreciation that matters to a writer of this kind of forums...

Slstock was a former admin of this forum and this forum is open for Slstock to come and explain his position and action to his previous loyal members of the Sri Lanka Equity Forum who may have followed him. If he doesn't do it surely it reflects and manifest his guilt and ulterior motives.

SHARK wrote:Its better SLS clarify himself on the above statement he made, as this has caused some uneasiness to a section of the members.
But its his decision whether to venture on it or not.
If he feels a further statement is deemed unnecessary, then we all should move forward.

@Jonta
I held back my decision, as SLEF was where started off.I am here on voluntary basis.


Shark