My views on the locked post titled "Note to members from a former admin.

Parden me for openning this new thread on the following (locked) thread mainly due to my inability to give my views before it was closed.

http://forum.srilankaequity.com/t35041-note-to-members-from-a-former-admin

I hope that the publickly expressed policy of the management of this forum on "freedom of expression" will not be changed here.

I see this thread (opened by the GMnet & amply supported by Admins with flimsy grounds and illogical arguments) as a cheap act of politics by the Admins to tarnish the Huge image of a Gentlman called SLS who toilled & provided yeoman service to bring this forum to the present level. The general consenses of views forced the Admins to close the thread simply unable to hold the ground intended. In fact it back fired. 

Any one who can read simple English will not see any thing wrong or unethical or illegal in the original post by SLS in ISF. GMnet who copied it had no courtecy to acknowledge its source.

Dear members over to you Sirs. You may decide who has done what. I am not here to give any verdict. You are the jury.

Dear Hapu,

The Thread has been opened Now.

K.Haputantri wrote:Parden me for openning this new thread on the following (locked) thread mainly due to my inability to give my views before it was closed.

http://forum.srilankaequity.com/t35041-note-to-members-from-a-former-admin

I hope that the publickly expressed policy of the management of this forum on "freedom of expression" will not be changed here.

I see this thread (opened by the GMnet & amply supported by Admins with flimsy grounds and illogical arguments) as a cheap act of politics by the Admins to tarnish the Huge image of a Gentlman called SLS who toilled & provided yeoman service to bring this forum to the present level. The general consenses of views forced the Admins to close the thread simply unable to hold the ground intended. In fact it back fired. 

Any one who can read simple English will not see any thing wrong or unethical or illegal in the original post by SLS in Investor Sentiments Forum. GMnet who copied it had no courtecy to acknowledge its source.

Dear members over to you Sirs. You may decide who has done what. I am not here to give any verdict. You are the jury.

@ K. Haputanri- I agree with you wholeheartedly. 
Not only the arbitrary locking of thread, by the powers that be,  but more importantly quoted SLS out of context in given article. it just goes to show the lack of professionalism. This is the danger in letting unsuitable types run the show.

Dear Hapu,

On behalf of the forum we allowed the thread to be kept opened, and allowed ample time for concern person to put his comments, it was not a sudden decision to keep it locked. Since responses from the individual not forthcoming i took the decision to close as i felt its not ethical to have it open and it may be detrimental for the same person.as he is not willing to give a clariciation.

Nobody is accusing anyone, but contents are some what skewed in my opinion and open for ambiguity.

As Admins & Mods we have acted with self restraint allowing both parties to opine their views.

What happened thereafter was it became a personal attack on us and wild accusations without substantial proof of dual identity of GMNet & Sstar, to cover the original issue deceitfully.

In this connection to safeguard the SLEF, Me and Sstar have disclosed publicly exonerating our Forum & distancing with the statement.

Lastly no one is denying the services of past Admins & Mods. This should not be misunderstood. As SLEF recognises the past efforts of these leaders.

Hapu, i have come to know how this whole issue began and i am seeing the signs clearly. i do not want to discuss it here and best leave it closed for the sake of good old times.

The Alchemist wrote:

K.Haputantri wrote:Parden me for openning this new thread on the following (locked) thread mainly due to my inability to give my views before it was closed.

http://forum.srilankaequity.com/t35041-note-to-members-from-a-former-admin

I hope that the publickly expressed policy of the management of this forum on "freedom of expression" will not be changed here.

I see this thread (opened by the GMnet & amply supported by Admins with flimsy grounds and illogical arguments) as a cheap act of politics by the Admins to tarnish the Huge image of a Gentlman called SLS who toilled & provided yeoman service to bring this forum to the present level. The general consenses of views forced the Admins to close the thread simply unable to hold the ground intended. In fact it back fired. 

Any one who can read simple English will not see any thing wrong or unethical or illegal in the original post by SLS in Investor Sentiments Forum. GMnet who copied it had no courtecy to acknowledge its source.

Dear members over to you Sirs. You may decide who has done what. I am not here to give any verdict. You are the jury.

@ K. Haputanri- I agree with you wholeheartedly. 
Not only the arbitrary locking of thread, by the powers that be,  but more importantly quoted SLS out of context in given article. it just goes to show the lack of professionalism. This is the danger in letting unsuitable types run the show.

Dear Alchemist - Its not what matters you and me or Hapu has to say about it.It will give more weightage if the same gentleman clarifies what he really meant.Thats all. example If you think a man does not want to defend him self in the ring, the referee should let the match continue or discontinue. I do not understand the logic here.

SHARK wrote:Dear Hapu,

On behalf of the forum we allowed the thread to be kept opened, and allowed ample time for concern person to put his comments, it was not a sudden decision to keep it locked. Since responses from the individual not forthcoming i took the decision to close as i felt its not ethical to have it open and it may be detrimental  for the same person.as he is not willing to give a clariciation.

Nobody is accusing anyone, but contents are some what skewed in my opinion and open for ambiguity.

I do not think you are getting the point. The point is that someone in your "A" team took something written out of context from a article SLS wrote in cyberspace
and printed it here, without courtesy to mention source, entire article etc and without permission, and then you expect an explanation from sls ? have you gone out of your head ? i hope all these technical analyses is not making you go off your rocker.   

I think it is your duty as the co-administrator or whoever you are here, to take these type of trouble maker postings to task. instead you are just wimping out. are you scared of your masters ?

The Alchemist wrote:

SHARK wrote:Dear Hapu,

On behalf of the forum we allowed the thread to be kept opened, and allowed ample time for concern person to put his comments, it was not a sudden decision to keep it locked. Since responses from the individual not forthcoming i took the decision to close as i felt its not ethical to have it open and it may be detrimental  for the same person.as he is not willing to give a clariciation.

Nobody is accusing anyone, but contents are some what skewed in my opinion and open for ambiguity.

I do not think you are getting the point. The point is that someone in your "A" team took something written out of context from a article SLS wrote in cyberspace
and printed it here, without courtesy to mention source, entire article etc and without permission, and then you expect an explanation from sls ? have you gone out of your head ? i hope all these technical analyses is not making you go off your rocker.   

I think it is your duty as the co-administrator or whoever you are here, to take these type of trouble maker postings to task. instead you are just wimping out. are you scared of your masters ?

Same thing i am saying to you, you dont get the point either. whether out in another forum if the statement is genuine and he has not denied it whats the problem my friend. there was no part taken out of context as far as i know. and if you have the full text why dont you PM me. This is the main reason i did not want this issue to escalate whilst allowing degree of freedom.

You nailed it alchemist.

These guys at SLEF do not know the meaning of plagiarism...Pathetic...

But trying to show how professional they are. Feel sorry for the innocent investors who come to this forum to get an advice from these so called professionals...  

Now do not try to ban me..hehehe..GMnet Gspot Gimicks

@SHARK, What do you understand when you read what slstock wrote ? what is the ambiquity ? that was just a para from a complete post by slstock, that GMNet just copied here. It was a deliberate mischevious act. by quoting what sls wrote out of context of the entire article. 
GMNet singlehandedly was responsible for the ouster of slstock, very unceremoniously, if you recall in feb 2014. i remember that you too, then, had many reservations on the conduct of your current masters.   
If you have an ounce of gratitude for slstock for his immense contribution to this very forum, you should ban GMNet immediately for this mischievous act by GMNet. 
You should also tender an apology to slstock immediately for all the pain you and GMNet may have caused him.  

Ban that fellow GMNet. Show us your true colours SHARK.
we are watching........

The Alchemist wrote:@SHARK, What do you understand when you read what slstock wrote ? what is the ambiquity ? that was just a para from a complete post by slstock, that GMNet just copied here. It was a deliberate mischevious act. by quoting what sls wrote out of context of the entire article. 
GMNet singlehandedly was responsible for the ouster of slstock, very unceremoniously, if you recall in feb 2014. i remember that you too, then, had many reservations on the conduct of your current masters.   
If you have an ounce of gratitude for slstock for his immense contribution to this very forum, you should ban GMNet immediately for this mischievous act by GMNet. 
You should also tender an apology to slstock immediately for all the pain you and GMNet may have caused him.  

Ban that fellow GMNet. Show us your true colours SHARK.
we are watching........

OMG Alchemist, can you PM me the entire article please. I will have a look at it. Yes true i left and discontinued my thread for some time until i took stock of clear picture as to what was happening then. I am not going criticise the actions of a former admin as it not proper and not the way i was brought up.Please refer to my response given in another thread to Jonta999.
I cant remember the name of the thread now.
I have detailed about why i am not doing so as i need both to be here.

Jonta999 gets hyper active in these situations   and seeing few posts .........

I will surely have look at the full article if you provide me via PM.

Kind regards
SHARK

Dear Alchemists Hapu and Jonta

I have never accused previous Admin but kept very silent without my personal inclingings to them to distract the current admin work i am doing.This may irritate some or use as a bashing at me, but i like you hapy for having this discussion on a more civilised way.

Also Jonta
thankful for all of you though i have not seen you in person

SHARK

How can he ban Gumnet?

He would say " Yes ma'am ma'am three bags full..."

Don't act yo do not know nothing shark...Don't try to fool the people who come to SLEF...You would have known what happened and what's happening here now.

SHARK wrote:

The Alchemist wrote:@SHARK, What do you understand when you read what slstock wrote ? what is the ambiquity ? that was just a para from a complete post by slstock, that GMNet just copied here. It was a deliberate mischevious act. by quoting what sls wrote out of context of the entire article. 
GMNet singlehandedly was responsible for the ouster of slstock, very unceremoniously, if you recall in feb 2014. i remember that you too, then, had many reservations on the conduct of your current masters.   
If you have an ounce of gratitude for slstock for his immense contribution to this very forum, you should ban GMNet immediately for this mischievous act by GMNet. 
You should also tender an apology to slstock immediately for all the pain you and GMNet may have caused him.  

Ban that fellow GMNet. Show us your true colours SHARK.
we are watching........

OMG Alchemist, can you PM me the entire article please. I will have a look at it. Yes true i left and discontinued my thread for some time until i took stock of clear picture as to what was happening then. I am not going criticise the actions of a former admin as it not proper and not the way i was brought up.Please refer to my response given in another thread to Jonta999.
I cant remember the name of the thread now.
I have detailed about why i am not doing so as i need both to be here.

Jonta999 gets hyper active in these situations   and seeing few posts .........

I will surely have look at the full article if you provide me via PM.

Kind regards
SHARK

Shark do you want us to believe that you don't know that this was a part of an article, nonsense!!!

TT
All i know this was the whole article.
If you have the full article please provide it via PM i will have look at it and come back to you.

SharK

SHARK wrote:
Yes true i left and discontinued my thread for some time until i took stock of clear picture as to what was happening then.

Kind regards
SHARK

This the message when he left at that time here and joined to start Harmonic Trading thread in some where in the Cyber space (may be go back there after getting full treatment from Hon. GMNet), not saying bye there  and came back here.

The part of your response is a staightforward lie. Where does it say anyone wanted to talk about identity of gmnet or sstar? I made a comment somewhere else where jonta mentioned about banning him. Can you please show us where on that forum anyone has commented about this? You have given a childish answer to locking the thread. You did it to save your a** as well as other admins from opposing comments  .

SHARK wrote:Dear Hapu,

On behalf of the forum we allowed the thread to be kept opened, and allowed ample time for concern person to put his comments, it was not a sudden decision to keep it locked. Since responses from the individual not forthcoming i took the decision to close as i felt its not ethical to have it open and it may be detrimental  for the same person.as he is not willing to give a clariciation.

Nobody is accusing anyone, but contents are some what skewed in my opinion and open for ambiguity.

As Admins & Mods we have acted with self restraint allowing both parties to opine their views.

What happened thereafter was it became a personal attack on us and wild accusations without substantial proof of dual identity of GMNet & Sstar, to cover the original issue deceitfully.

In this connection to safeguard the SLEF, Me and Sstar have disclosed publicly exonerating our Forum & distancing with the statement.

Lastly no one is denying the services of past Admins & Mods. This should not be misunderstood. As SLEF recognises the past efforts of these leaders.

Hapu, i have come to know how this whole issue began and i am seeing the signs clearly. i do not want to discuss it here and best leave it closed for the sake of good old times.

Please find the thread detail and the part cut and pasted could be find on page 6.

*****************************************************************

Dear Kumar,

Please PM me to have a look at it.

SHARK

Gmnet is a like a lady who is in "linda langa sangamaya". She does not know how to keep her mouth shut and to stay away without interfering in to others work

Kumar wrote:Please find the thread detail and the part cut and pasted could be find on page 6.

*****************************************************************

Dear Kumar,

Please PM me to have a look at it.

SHARK

Dear Kumar,
Isnt it good practice what you preach preach what you practice ...... few moments ago.
Please PM me the full article i will take care of it.

Thanks

Meman wrote:The part of your response is a staightforward lie. Where does it say anyone wanted to talk about identity of gmnet or sstar? I made a comment somewhere else where jonta mentioned about banning him. Can you please show us where on that forum anyone has commented about this? You have given a childish answer to locking the thread. You did it to save your a** as well as other admins from opposing comments  .

Dear Hapu
Do you accept this type behavior....... Please read that thread you will see who is accusing of Dual identity.

This is the professionalism others holding in high esteem.

SHARK

All this people other than Alchemist Hapu bragging here have not got a clue what they know not.

Please PM me that entire POST that was supposed to have copy pasted.

I will have a look at it and take action if necessary.

SHARK wrote:

Kumar wrote:Please find the thread detail and the part cut and pasted could be find on page 6.

*****************************************************************

Dear Kumar,

Please PM me to have a look at it.

SHARK

Dear Kumar,
Isnt it good practice what you preach preach what you practice ...... few moments ago.
Please PM me the full article i will take care of it.

Thanks

Practising and preaching work with human beings.

Why you can't spend few minutes to go to the other forum and look for the thread what we are talking. ( No one is going to accept you do not have enough time to go to other forum to spend few minutes during the last couple of days)

You are bluffing to The Alchemist, other members who commented on this thread and now me to send PM. Don't you think its childish?

GL

My question still remain unanswered.......

Same how you gave a screen shot of i wrote, send it via PM or below is my email ID

sharkster975@gmail.com

I have never hidden the reason why i quit and why i returned.

Any one can venture out no body is holding anyone back.

I am still waiting for the screen shot.

Regards
SHARK