FIRST CAPITAL HOLDINGS PLC (CFVF.N0000)

karuna wrote:

karuna wrote:cfvf 2014 may me august traded 50/60 but unfortunately continuously they're profit was lost (+ to -) look at  
2015 march basic earning per share -0.9 
2015 octomber  eps                    -1.60 but traded at 30/25 level because they're assent is very good level comparing some shares . unfortunately market crash after cfvf came to 18 level and again slowly  move up to 21.5 today .

2015 December earning per share + 1.20 
                            they convert  again to profit making share . so last year they make loose share 2014 they make profit share .
2014 July eps over 6.5 traded 60 .i expecting 2016 2 quarter eps will be 2.5 minimum
maximum 3.20and my protection is a 2015  they traded 25 with lose earning per one share so 2015/dec last quarter eps 1.20 and market also move up 400 points with last resister but cfvf only move 18/21.5  i think cfvf can move 30/32 very soon my target price this July/June 45/50 levels because eps and assent  also recovering well 

sometime like 2014  they post 2 q report over 6.20 eps and price pump continuously up.
anyhow i am positive with cfvf.n my target is a 45/50 with this June/July thanks this is my view

Cfvf better than aluf gran tafl bfl jkh ubc comb samp 
Just for another 3/5 month I know tafl is a good returning share but comparing if u brought 92 level tafl 1000 shares u have to pay 92 000 and if you waiting to sell 120 u can get may be 28000 profit
If you like to buy Cfvf for same amount may be u can buy 4800 shares . If you waiting to sell 32 u can get 48000 Cfvf only need to up 10 rupee tafl have to up 135/140 may be get more than profit its mean 50 rupee need to up. Its very hard because many people in profit as well they like to sell more. 
But Cfvf  was a loose two quatres Eps and again last quarter they show very good Eps just for the quarter
So we can expect with in another 3/5 month Cfvf price to 45/50 because its came 60/18 and again recovering so I think Cfvf better than tafl

Chinwi wrote:

Ok One wrote:

Chinwi wrote:

anyhow i am positive with cfvf.n my target is a 45/50 with this June/July thanks this is my view

තව මාස 3 කින් CFVF 45-50 ට යන්න නම්  මීට වසරකට දෙකකට කලින් තිබුන ඉන්ටරෙස්ට් රේට් මේ වන විට කීයකින් අඩු වෙන්නෙ ඕනද ?  නමුත් එසේ වී නැත​.
CFVF යනු ඊළඟ කාර්තු වේ දෙකේ ලෙබෙන EPS කලින්  දල වශයෙන් හිතා ගත හැකි සමාගමකි.
TB රේට් හැසිරීම මත  මේ වසරේ   අලාභ ලැබෙන බව කලින්  දුටු අය පසුගිය වසරේ CFVF 55 ට විකුණුවා.
යලි 45-50 ට යන්න තරම් ලාභ ලැබීමට නම් මේ වන විටත් TB රේට් 2-3% කින් වත් අඩු වී තිබිය යුතුයි.  ​

Mr,Chinwi CFVF TB Rate mathama yepena samagamakda ?  

Natha.   Dan e aya diversify karamin yanawa.  

Namuth pasugiya vaara 2 - 3 ma (2009/10, 2014) adhika laaba labune rate venasa nisa. (eg. form 20% coming down to 10 % )

Ada venakota long term TB rate 14% pannala yanavalu.

Rates are climbing again without any ha ho.

5 year rate 13 % - 01-04-2016
9-15 year rate increased towards 13.8 -14.23 %   Now the rates are even going over the controversial 30 year bond issue rates - the mishap they did  at the beginning.  

365 day rates were increasing with slight drop last time , 8th April.

This will badly affect on CFVF. (and CSEC too) . BUT, in short run they may show/get some profit by matching long term bonds and short term loans.

http://www.cbsl.gov.lk/htm/english/_cei/ir/i_3.asp

I feel  this can go towards 16-18% due to unrealistic expenditure of this government ( promised and set at presidential election ) Still they have not found any answer to this problem.

kjojo wrote:mchn according to the information i got cfvf deliver superb result . yu can imagine the result .because they will deliver huge profit . you remember the name try to buy below 36 .im waiting to buy another 1laks or 2laks below 36.

kjojo wrote:yes but horse is CFVF... IF YOU HAVE  DONT SELL . CFVF LATA BID KARANDA PULUWAN 5 PARAK. DEN UPARIMA 10 BIDS KORALA TIYANE . DANA HETIYATA..  SO THIS TIME HUGE PROFIT....  DIVI 5 RUPPES MAY BE.

kjojo wrote:Nima that cl ekak denam ok ape fund manager mathak kora keyapan HSBC .

he he yes wrote:  yes