dindon1 wrote:Just check your selves asking prices of GREG.,
About 2000,000 shares in asking section are higher prices and they are in lots of 100,000s,200,000s and 300,000s.,Who dont call it manipulating?
“In multiple instances,
the large orders [the defendant] placed were filled in smaller blocks at successively rising prices. All of these transactions, the Commission alleges, were part of a manipulative
scheme to create the artificial appearance of demand for the securities in question, enabling unidentified
sellers to profit and inducing others to buy these stocks based on
unexplained increases in the
volume and price of the shares.”— Securities and Exchange Commission( In USA)
Did I mention the same thing but appropriately demonstrated using the numbers according to the situation(supply pattern instead of demand pattern above) we saw today in my original post?
Can any one (except that smallwillie guy who habitually whinges as soon as I post something)see anything to do with promoting the particular stock?
GREG s turn over stands at the third place today.,Yesterday it was second highest,if i am not mistaken.,
And sort of, higher turn over during all week.,So whats wrong if we give more weight to such a stock and talk about it? Or are you guys want us to talk about some shares never traded during whole week??
Whats wrong with some people who hate speculative shares?why is it,If some one notice something and share it with others branded like a promoter?
You must admit that there are stocks called speculative stocks in any market in the world and most of them do good than bad.,Do you guys know that speculative stocks keep the turnover up considerably?Also how important the market value and share turnover help when categorizing an exchange.
Got more to write but why am I wasting my valuable time on those fruitcakes?